Remember when?

I was nine when this happened, but it left an indelible memory. For a brief moment, all things seemed possible. Even my parents believed that the regime they had fled, that had persecuted them, denied them opportunities so that the sons and daughters of party elites could advance, even they believed that change was in the air. That this was the moment.

For weeks we watched, riveted to the television as it showed the rising tide of human aspiration and hope, in Tiennamen square and throughout China. But then the tanks rolled in, and we bore witness to the might of the state as it turned its guns and its tanks against the very citizens they claimed to represent.

We made our protest in front of the Chinese consulate joining thousands of others who were disgusted with the raw aggression of the Chinese state. But in the end, our protest was only symbolic, drowned out by first by the violence of the Chinese state, then later by the flood of economic development.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  politics  
Comments (0)
Posted 6 months ago

Op-Ed Contributor - We Didn’t Have to Lose Arlen Specter - NYTimes.com

I have said that, without question, we cannot prevail as a party without conservatives. But it is equally certain we cannot prevail in the future without moderates.

A very insightful NYTimes Op-Ed piece from Olympia Snow, distinguished Republican senator from Maine. With the departure of Arlen Specter to the Democrats, she is one of the few remaining Republican moderates and a lone voice in the wilderness calling for the return of Republicans to relevance in American politics. Will the rest of her party listen?

Given my support for the Democratic party in the past few elections, it may seem surprising that my tendencies lean towards the right. I believe that many of the basic tenets of the Republican party --- limited government, fiscal conservatism, and individual liberty --- are attractive not only to those on the right, but also to a large segment of the independent and moderate voters. Yet, the Democratic party, sitting to the left of these values, has largely capture this segment of the voting population.

Unfortunately, with the extreme right and social conservatives holding the Republican party hostage (and in many cases, frustrating a return to these core tenets), it will be a long road. Likely they will spend many years in the wilderness before a charismatic leader can rise to lead the party back to power. Until then, let's hope that we can successfully navigate these treacherous times with single-party control, and no reasonable and respectful opposition.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  politics  
Comments (0)
Posted 7 months ago

Auto-Tune the News #2: pirates. drugs. gay marriage.

Phase Vocoder = Fourier Transform WIN.

Glad to see that math is useful in real life. Without the power of Mr. Fourier, T-Pain wouldn't have his voice.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  politics  
Comments (0)
Posted 7 months ago

China Fears Tremors as Migrants Flock From Coast - NYTimes.com

On my last visit home, my dad and I got to talking about rural peasants as the source of social unrest in China. I told him I didn't believe that they could organize themselves into a coherent mass movement that could challenge the government, given the communist party's stranglehold over political life in China.

He sort of chuckled and told me that not only was it possible, he even gave a few scenarios about how it could happen. The problem is basically that the Chinese peasant, now armed with a taste of prosperity, will be unwilling to go back to farming and be a "good peasant." In the past, he was content simply to have enough to eat --- now he sees how rich his urban compatriots have become, he wants a piece, and he's going to be angry if he doesn't get it.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  politics  
Comments (0)
Posted 9 months ago

The Crisis of Credit Visualized

Pretty amazing video that summarizes, in a visually compelling way. Excellent for the layperson. (Thanks to Austin for the heads up)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  politics  
Comments (0)
Posted 9 months ago

Learning and Scientific Reasoning: Chinese Students Compared Against American Ones

Ever since I was a kid, my parents have told me how rotten and lazy
American students were and how Chinese students, with their diligence
and work ethic, would inherit the world due to their superior
education. If that weren't enough, there's the constant drumbeat of
our own media decrying the crisis in our schools, the poor conditions,
and the lack of accountability.
 
Now of course I'm not suggesting that our students can get away with
being lazy or that our schools don't face immense challenges preparing
the next generation of students. But I also think our schools have
many strengths and that such strengths are often under-appreciated.
For instance, consider this study just published in Science magazine
comparing Chinese and American students.
 
In China, students take a standardized national curriculum with 5
years of physics courses. America, on the other hand, contains a
greater diversity of approaches, and thus students have not had much
formal training in physics. So, in a test of physics knowledge and
scientific reasoning administered to freshman college students, who
would do better: the Chinese or the Americans?
 
Unsurprisingly, the Chinese outperform American students on tests of
physics knowledge --- things like mechanics, electricity and
magnetism. They killed us on all of those problems with balls, ramps,
pendulums, circuits, charges, etc. But the surprising thing was that
American students matched the Chinese on scientific knowledge! That's
right --- in the study, there were essentially no differences between
Chinese and American freshman students.
 
So what does this tell you? On one had, it should be sobering that our
students knew so little about physics, an essential topic that every
educated person should know something about (disclaimer: I'm a physics
student). On the other hand, we have much to be proud of -- our kids
have the right stuff when it comes to reasoning. Where did they get
this from? Probably from the way they were taught, which in America
means a diet of inquiry-based courses where thinking is emphasized
over rote memorization.
 
One could even see this result as an indictment against the Chinese
educational system; despite much more training, Chinese students seem
to have picked up only the facts, an conclusion that was also reached
in the study:


The results from this study are consistent with existing research, which suggests that current education and assessment in the STEM disciplines often emphasize factual recall over deep understanding of science reasoning


 
Of course, we shouldn't rest on our laurels -- American education is
still broken in many ways. Our schools are still failing them, but
perhaps not in the way you might think. But the results of this study
show that in our drive to improve our educational systems, we musn't
throw out the baby with the bath water and wholeheartedly embrace a
testing-only based curriculum. That is to say, we must not discard the
very things that make our educational system great.
 
Caption: Content knowledge and reasoning skills diverge. Comparisons
of U.S. and Chinese freshmen college students show differences on
tests of physics content knowledge but not on tests of scientific
reasoning.
 
Taken from "Learning and Scientific Reasoning", Science 30 January
2009: Vol. 323. no. 5914, pp. 586 - 587

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  politics   science  
Comments (0)
Posted 10 months ago

Science and Democracy

If we are not practicing good science, we probably aren't
practicing good democracy. And vice versa.


 
Probably the best quote from Dennis Overbye's essay "Elevating
Science, Elevating Democracy" that appeared today in the New York
Times. One of the greatest misconceptions about science is that it is
a body of facts to be memorized. The persistence of this myth has
everything to do with science's presentation in our educational
system, from the primary level all the way into our universities. Of
course, nothing could be further from the truth. It is true that
science deals with facts; however, the true kernel of science comes
with the human thought that links those facts into ideas and a
coherent framework. The true kernel is the debate and argument and the
constant tension that is applied with each successive generation to
those facts.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/science/27essa.html

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  politics   science  
Comment (1)
Posted 10 months ago

Yes we can.

Even now, months after the election, thinking about Obama's victory
still gives the chills. I remember thinking that only in America are
all things possible, that this is still one of the rare places in the
world where things are made true through the collective force of human
will. I know that we as a nation face incredible obstacles, and that
Obama will not fix our problems. But I do believe that many years in
the future, I can look back and be proud that I, along with the rest
of my country, were on the right side of history.
 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  politics  
Comments (0)
Posted 10 months ago

Why socialized health care will not work

I've often remarked that if we are to have a socialized health care
system here in the United States, we will have to treat health care as
a commodity, a product, whose use is subject to the same cost-benefit
analysis as any other product.
 
Stark utilitarianism would be the only way to divide up the scarce
resources that the government can afford to put into the health care
system. This would entail some tough questions and choices --- just
how much money is a human life worth? Are resources better spent
trying to save a life of a 75 year old smoker over a 5 year old with
aggressive cancer? At what point would deny treatment because it was
deemed to provide too little benefit with respect to its costs? Who
would decide?
 
People have often remarked that "we need a national health care system
now." Unfortunately, unless people are willing to confront these
questions, national health care will ultimately fail. And probably
with dire consequences; I'm pretty sure that with a coldly utilitarian
lens, we could probably substantially improve the living standard for
a large number of Americans. But until we start making these
decisions, we'll continue to limp along with no system for managing
the health of large numbers of uninsured citizens.
 
 Nobody --- citizens, politicians --- has the guts to make these stark
choices. No politician wants to defend a choice to deny somebody's
mother an expensive, low-probability cancer treatment. No politician
would be willing to stand on the floor of congress and proclaim that
some people's lives just aren't worth the money it would cost to save
them.
 
As a case study, consider the nationalized health care system in the
UK. There, they actually have an institute that decides -- coldly,
dispassionately, cruelly --- how much money a life is worth. And of
course they're beset with protests, lawsuits, and complaints. It's
heartbreaking to see people die from diseases that may be treated with
some new experimental drug, or to see people lose a year or more of
life because they only get the second-best drug, not the
state-of-the-art. But what people don't realize is that without these
harsh choices, a large number of folks would be condemned to a
lifetime of inadequate care. This, unfortunately, is probably the
lesser of two evils.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/03/health/03nice.html?pagewanted=all
 
Aside: I can't believe that Pfizer actually sued the British
government over their rationing of Viagra?! When people are *dying* of
actual diseases, is it really money well spent to ensure that
60-something men can pork their elderly wives?! On the other hand,
utilitarianism seeks the greatest good for the greatest number ...
 
Caption: It's their fault that socialized health care will never work.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  politics  
Comments (2)
Posted 1 year ago

What is it with Republicans and the proper english?


My concern has been the atrocities there in Darfur and the relevance to me with that issue as we spoke about Africa and some of the countries there that were kind of the people succumbing to the dictators and the corruption of some collapsed governments on the
continent, the relevance was Alaska's investment in Darfur with some of our permanent fund dollars.

-- Sarah Palin



http://cavett.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/14/the-wild-wordsmith-of-wasilla/?em

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //  politics  
Comments (0)
Posted 1 year ago